EPSRC National Crystallography Service
Data Collection Summary kccd2 (damien)


Summary report for Directory: diska/2005src0459r

Report generated Jun 09, 2005; 09:44:43

Unit cell

4037 reflections with 2.91°<theta<27.48° (resolution between 7.00A and 0.77A) were used for unit cell refinement

Symmetry used
in scalepack
p2
a (Angstrom)5.6210 +/- 0.0006
b (Angstrom)56.453 +/- 0.007
c (Angstrom)7.8578 +/- 0.0009
alpha (°) 90.000
beta (°)102.963 +/- 0.005
gamma (°) 90.000
Volume (A**3)2429.9 +/- 0.5
Mosaicity (°)0.430 +/- 0.004

Data collection

Summary

Total number of images collected546
Total exposure time13.6 hours
Data collection exposure time13.5 hours
Data collection wall-clock time14.6 hours

Experimental Conditions

Wavelength0.71073 A
Crystal to detector distance90.00 mm

Scans

TypeName# imagesTotal
Rotation
Per frame
Rotation
Exposure
per frame
Used in
scaling
data collections01f121242.0° phi2.000°90 secondsYes
data collections02f148296.0° phi2.000°90 secondsYes
data collections03f25 50.0° omega2.000°90 secondsYes
data collections04f90180.0° omega2.000°90 secondsYes
data collections05f40 80.0° omega2.000°90 secondsYes
data collections06f45 90.0° omega2.000°90 secondsYes
data collections07f17 34.0° omega2.000°90 secondsYes
data collections08f52104.0° omega2.000°90 secondsYes
Phi/Chii01f - i08f850 seconds

Scalepack Scaling

Deleted observations

Rejected 254
Zero sigma or profile test 427
Overload or incomplete profile 912
Sigma cutoff 219
High resolution limit 642

Final Data Set

Scale factor range0.11-19.77
Number of 'full' reflections 11854
Number of 'partial' reflections  4083
Total number of integrated reflections 14909
Total number of unique reflections  4790
Data completeness  85.0%
Resolution range7.00-0.77 A
Theta range2.91°-27.48°
Average Intensity   19.3
Average Sigma(I)    1.9
Overall R-merge (linear)  0.181

Sadabs Results

Parameter refinement on 8079 reflections reduced R(int) from 0.1632 to 0.0724

Before rejection, 16480 reflections total and 4899 unique

After rejection, 15875 reflections total and 4881 unique

Runs

  Run 2-theta  R(int)  Incid. factors  Diffr. factors    K     Total I>2sig(I)
    1   -5.2  0.0582   1.810 - 2.618   0.938 - 1.317   1.320    1982    1650
    2   35.0  0.1430   0.490 - 0.833   0.866 - 1.194   1.360    3678    1942
    3  -34.4  0.1532   0.550 - 0.666   0.960 - 1.478   1.479    1293     593
    4  -34.4  0.1212   0.514 - 0.818   0.928 - 1.418   1.311    3173    1696
    5   34.4  0.1078   0.391 - 0.557   0.904 - 1.094   1.295    1184     615
    6   34.2  0.1063   0.513 - 0.703   0.838 - 1.067   1.277     981     436
    7   34.4  0.1528   0.308 - 0.375   0.900 - 1.026   1.292     682     346
    8   34.4  0.1016   0.591 - 1.386   0.922 - 1.113   1.269    2902    1673

Sadabs Results

Parameter refinement on 6752 reflections reduced R(int) from 0.1551 to 0.0673

Before rejection, 13650 reflections total and 4600 unique

After rejection, 13311 reflections total and 4581 unique

Runs

  Run 2-theta  R(int)  Incid. factors  Diffr. factors    K     Total I>2sig(I)
    1    5.2  0.0644   0.918 - 1.300   0.939 - 1.139   1.449    1698    1355
    2  -35.0  0.1677   0.784 - 1.325   0.932 - 1.162   1.451    2580    1322
    3   34.4  0.1856   0.815 - 1.000   0.904 - 1.157   1.600    1287     580
    4   34.4  0.1326   0.736 - 1.134   0.950 - 1.167   1.387    2598    1415
    5  -34.4  0.1133   0.774 - 1.052   0.926 - 1.127   1.428     757     367
    6  -34.2  0.0785   0.431 - 0.855   0.867 - 1.193   1.239    1137     814
    7  -34.4  0.1568   0.855 - 0.959   0.891 - 1.036   1.388     430     234
    8  -34.4  0.1126   0.427 - 0.957   0.900 - 1.124   1.199    2824    1596
Ratio of minimum to maximum apparent transmission: 0.567015

Metadata

  Group    Service  
  Operator   Peter Horton  
  Sample Owner   Dr. J. H. R. Tucker  
  Local Code   FESCH3  
  Formula   C29 H37 N3 O2 S1 Fe1  
  Crystal Colour    Orange  
  Crystal Habit    Rod  
  Crystal Size   0.34 x 0.05 x 0.03 (mm3) 
  Temperature   120(K) 
  Generator   50 (kV)   85 (mA) 
  Primary Solvent     
  Other Solvents     

File Explanations

SampleCode.zip
      SampleCode.hkl - data corrected using  SADABS
      SampleCode_merge_none.hkl - equivalents and friedels kept separate  (See "Final Data Set" table in this report)
      SampleCode.p4p - skeleton p4p file for use with XPREP
      SampleCode.htm - this summary file


Southampton CIF entry fields

_exptl_absorpt_process_details       'SADABS V2.10 (Sheldrick, G.M., 2003)'

_diffrn_ambient_temperature           120(2)
_diffrn_radiation_wavelength           0.71073
_diffrn_radiation_type                      MoK\a
_diffrn_radiation_source                  'Bruker-Nonius FR591 rotating anode'
_diffrn_radiation_monochromator    '10cm confocal mirrors'
_diffrn_measurement_device_type  'Bruker-Nonius 95mm CCD camera on \k-goniostat'
_diffrn_measurement_method          '\f & \w scans'
_diffrn_detector_area_resol_mean   9.091

_computing_data_collection        
'COLLECT (Hooft, R.W.W., 1998)'
_computing_cell_refinement        
'DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) & COLLECT (Hooft, R.W.W., 1998)'
#Although determined using DirAx, the cell is refined in the HKL
#package during data reduction
_computing_data_reduction         
'DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) & COLLECT (Hooft, R.W.W., 1998)' 

Software References

Unit Cell Determination using DirAx:
Duisenberg AJM. Indexing in Single-Crystal Diffractometry with an Obstinate List of Reflections. Journal of Applied Crystallography 1992; 25: 92-96.
Duisenberg AJM, Hooft RWW, Schreurs AMM, Kroon J. Accurate cells from area-detector images. Journal of Applied Crystallography 2000; 33: 893-898.

Diffractometer control and strategy calculation using COLLECT:
Hooft RWW. COLLECT data collection software, Nonius B.V., 1998.

Standard Data Reduction using HKL(Denzo & Scalepack):
Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Macromolecular Crystallography, Pt A. 1997; 276: 307-326.

Absorption Correction
Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). SADABS. Version 2.10. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Non-Standard Data Reduction using EvalCCD:
Duisenberg AJM, Kroon-Batenburg LMJ, Schreurs AMM. An intensity evaluation method: EVAL-14. Journal of Applied Crystallography 2003; 36: 220-229.

For more information visit the service web site at: http://www.soton.ac.uk/~xservice/